Controlled Pilot Application
Apply for a Controlled ICOP Pilot.
Run a controlled review of 3 to 10 project decisions. ICOP maps each decision to available evidence, alternatives, approvals, gaps, and outcome exposure so your team can see where decision traceability is strong or weak.
Confidential and scoped. Synthetic, sanitized, reconstructed, or limited real project context accepted. Human-reviewed.
What a pilot produces
- ▸Evidence posture
- ▸Decision gap map
- ▸Traceability notes
- ▸Human-reviewed pilot readout
- ▸No legal advice, no fault assignment, no automated decisions
Engagement Model
A confidential, controlled validation exercise.
Who Should Apply
Teams that must review and defend construction decisions.
Suitable Pilot Contexts
Where a controlled decision review adds the most value.
Required Input
Minimum input for a controlled pilot.
Pilot Output
What participants may receive.
Success Criteria
What makes a pilot successful.
The pilot is successful if the project team can identify decision gaps, evidence gaps, unclear review points, undocumented alternatives, or weak accountability trails faster than with its current process.
The success criterion is not whether ICOP produces a perfect answer.
The success criterion is whether ICOP improves the team's ability to inspect decision quality before risk hardens into delay, cost, dispute, or accountability exposure.
Scope Boundary
What ICOP does not do.
Disallowed Inputs
Do not send unrestricted project material.
Pilot Application
Submit a pilot application.
Strong applications name one decision type that creates downstream friction: change orders, RFIs, schedule-impact decisions, field-condition conflicts, technical approvals or incomplete evidence records.
After the application is reviewed, the next step is a scoped conversation to confirm whether synthetic, sanitized, reconstructed or limited real context is appropriate for the pilot.
Prefer LinkedIn? reach ICOP on LinkedIn.